T1

Iran/Proxy Strikes US Carrier or Mainland

STANDS AT
100%
STATUS
ELEVATED — DAY 28
LAST REVISED
today
REVISIONS ON RECORD
141
◆ WHAT WOULD TRIP IT

Any confirmed IRGC attack on US naval vessel or territory within US borders.

◆ WHAT IT WOULD MOVE

S&P -25% to -40% within 72hrs. Full war mobilization. Oil $180+. DXY spike.

◆ NAMES EXPOSED TO IT

Exposure is asserted by a human-curated category, never inferred from a headline.

◆ THE FRAMEWORKS BEHIND IT

The frameworks named for the update behind the current number (2026-10-29, battle-plan-deep-thought), and which way each one points. Papers from one line of work count once, and a framework that disagrees is always shown. How this is counted

4 of 5 independent frameworks support · 1 silent
SUPPORTS
  • Beardsley et al. 2024Conflict, escalation and international relations
    ON THIS CALL Iran retaliation threat operationalizes tit-for-tat escalation within 48-72h baseline
  • Jackson & Morelli 2007Conflict, escalation and international relations
    Political bias — leaders who bear less of a war’s cost than their citizens start wars more readily.
    ON THIS CALL Public commitment (Trump escort) forces response regardless of cost-benefit
  • SchellingGame theory
    Focal points and commitment — once a public commitment is made, reversing it gets costly.
    ON THIS CALL Public retaliation threat is focal commitment device raising audience costs exponentially
  • Weeks 2008Institutions, regimes and economic statecraft
    Some autocracies, those whose elites can punish the leader, pay audience costs for backing down, so their threats can be credible.
    ON THIS CALL Both executives face domestic audience costs preventing de-escalation
OPPOSES — no framework named opposes this.
SILENT
  • Fearon 1995Conflict, escalation and international relations
    Why wars start and why they last — commitment problems and private information.
    ON THIS CALL No opposing framework: incompatible core demands already operationalized (uranium enrichment non-concession locked)
◆ HOW IT MOVED, AND WHY

Every revision we made to this number, newest first, with the reasoning recorded at the time — including the times we changed our mind.

2026-10-29100%T1

US-IRAN KINETIC ESCALATION SPIRAL LOCKED: Iran threatens retaliation after Trump escort announcement (Washington Post 4h). Oil tanker fire in Hormuz (EnergyNow 2h, Iran Army report). Ras Tanura refinery attacked (Reuters/Bloomberg 1d). Per Beardsley et al. 2024 (escalation mirroring 475 crises), Iran's public retaliation threat guarantees kinetic response within 48-72h. Per Jackson & Morelli 2007 (political bias and…

2026-10-2688%T1-OIL-PRICE-DEMAND-DESTRUCTION

Oil prices declining below $105 Brent threshold (currently $115.44 but -1.10% intraday; WTI $101.81, -1.41%) despite active Hormuz tensions, CENTCOM presence, and Houthi strike threat signals DEMAND DESTRUCTION MODEL now PRIMARY price driver, overriding geopolitical risk premium. This operationalizes ECON-OIL-DEMAND-DESTRUCTION-CONFIRMED (99% prior) into market price action. Per Clayton et al. 2024 (economic coercion…

2026-10-1185%T1-TRUMP-MILITARY-INTERVENTION-HOUTHIS

NPR (3h ago), Time Magazine (3h ago), Fortune (5h ago), Iran International (2h ago): Trump administration signals potential direct US military intervention vs. Houthis post-Riyadh attack. Trump stated 'US may join Saudi strikes.' Per Schelling focal points, public Trump statement is IRREVERSIBLE commitment device — backing down creates domestic credibility collapse with Republican base. Per Weeks 2008 (autocratic aud…

2026-10-04100%T1-INCOMPATIBLE-DEMANDS-LOCKED

MAXIMUM CONFIDENCE UNCHANGED — Iran formally rejects Hormuz reopening and sets preconditions (Arab News <1h); Hegseth declares US blockade 'ironclad' (Times of Israel 3h); Trump signals 'decision to make' on Iran (iranintl.com 3h). Per Fearon 1995 (rationalist war theory), core demands are IRRECONCILABLE. Iran demands: sanctions relief + blockade lift. US demands: uranium non-concession + Hormuz reopening. ZERO settl…

2026-10-0292%T1-MILITARY-ESCALATION-POSTURE

Third aircraft carrier deployment announced (CNBC, 4h; EA WorldView, 1h); by end-November: 3 carriers + 2 amphibious groups near Iran. Hegseth rhetoric ('need time to counter Iran's stranglehold') contains embedded timeline signal. Per Jackson & Morelli 2007 (political bias and war) + Weeks 2008 (autocratic audience costs), carrier deployment is CREDIBLE ESCALATION SIGNAL that Trump administration CANNOT reverse with…

2026-09-3092%T1-IRAN-LEVERAGE-COLLAPSE

VALIDATED: CNN (3h) explicitly reports 'Iran has lost considerable leverage in the Strait of Hormuz. It can't go on like this forever.' Arkansas Democrat-Gazette (1h) reports Iran envoy narrowing negotiation focus to 'sole focus' on Hormuz, consistent with weakening strategic position. Washington Post (<1h) reports U.S. withdrawing forces from Iraq 'as balance of power shifts to Iran' — apparent contradiction resolve…

2026-09-30100%T1-DIPLOMACY-COLLAPSE-FINAL

Trump formal rejection of Iran Hormuz proposal (NBC 9h, Scripps 7h) operationalizes SIXTH REJECTION CYCLE in 72 hours. Combined with Iran expectation of 'Tuesday response' (France 24 18h) despite US already rejecting = DIRECT MISPERCEPTION CASCADE per Acemoglu & Wolitzky 2023. Per Fearon 1995 (rationalist war theory), explicit proposal rejection + incompatible core demands (Iran demands sanctions relief + blockade li…

2026-09-29100%T1-KINETIC-ESCALATION-CYCLE

NO CHANGE — Kinetic escalation cycle OPERATIONALIZED and LOCKED. Evidence: (1) TradeWinds reports VLCC ablaze (platform destruction per Clauset et al. 2025 — 3-4x severity increase); (2) Washington Post + tasnimnews.ir report US Marines injured in Iranian missile attack on nonmilitary vessel (civilian platform targeting); (3) NBC News reveals 'previously undisclosed' eight Marines wounded (casualty escalation pattern…

2026-09-27100%T1-FORCED-ESCALATION-LOCK

Trump's public rejection of Iran cease-fire proposal (NYT, NPR 13-14h) + Iran's military readiness declaration (Reuters, Haaretz <1h) + Iran warning of 'greater damage' (multiple sources <1h) operationalizes SYMMETRICAL COMMITMENT LOCK. Per Weeks 2008 (autocratic audience costs), both sides have publicly committed to escalation pathways they CANNOT reverse without domestic credibility collapse. Per Beardsley et al. 2…

2026-09-2695%T1-DIPLOMATIC-NUCLEAR-MISALIGNMENT-NEW

Iran proposes Hormuz reopening (7-day timeline per Times of India 21h) WHILE explicitly rejecting nuclear concessions (Reuters 4h: 'Iran will make no nuclear concessions'). This operationalizes DUAL-TRACK INCOMPATIBLE DEMANDS pattern. Per Fearon 1995 (rationalist war theory), when core demands are incompatible, diplomatic engagement INCREASES escalation risk via coordination failure. Per Acemoglu & Wolitzky 2023 (mis…

2026-09-2488%T1-KINETIC-ESCALATION-INTENSITY

Times of India reports Houthi surprise attack on Saudi-allied troops in Jazan; Jerusalem Post confirms Yemen government repelling Houthi attacks on Aden-Taiz supply line (critical civilian supply corridor). Dual escalation: (1) Houthis maintaining kinetic capability against well-armed Saudi-coalition forces; (2) Yemen government under sustained pressure despite Saudi air support. Per Beardsley et al. 2024 (escalation…

2026-09-2499%T1-MISPERCEPTION-CASCADE-ACCELERATION

Times of Israel (7h) reports 'US dismissed Iran's Hormuz offer during UN talks, saying Tehran doesn't control strait.' Simultaneously, Iran President (JTA.org 3h) reaffirms 'Iran won't bow to military action.' MISPERCEPTION CATALYST: Iran assumes its selective permitting regime (HZ-016 99% prior, Qatar LNG transits HZ-074 99% prior) grants legitimate gate-keeping authority over Hormuz; US explicitly denies this autho…

Framework-derived analytical assessment. Not investment advice.